BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Center for International and Regional Studies - ECPv6.15.15//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Center for International and Regional Studies
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Qatar
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:+03
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251030T080000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251101T170000
DTSTAMP:20260413T052340
CREATED:20251124T064414Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260114T085115Z
UID:10001591-1761811200-1762016400@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:Sudan in the Picture: Research on Sudanese Cinema Workshop I
DESCRIPTION:From October 30 to November 1\, 2025\, the Center for International and Regional Studies (CIRS) at Georgetown University in Qatar (GUQ) hosted a workshop under its research initiative\, Sudan in the Picture: Research on Sudanese Cinema. The gathering brought together a diverse group of scholars\, academics\, artists\, filmmakers\, and practitioners from across the globe to deliberate on the historical trajectory of Sudanese cinema\, as well as emerging cinematic trends amidst the ongoing conflict. \n\nThe workshop commenced with a discussion led by Khalid Ali\, titled “The Wedding of Zein: A Case Study for Remembering the Past\, Informing the Present\, and Shaping the Future of Sudanese Cinema.” He explored the collaborative effort between Sudanese author Tayeb Salih and Kuwaiti filmmaker Khalid Al Siddiq in adapting “The Wedding of Zein” into a 1976 film. He underscored this as a groundbreaking Arab-African artistic partnership\, fusing literature and cinema to portray Sudan’s multi-ethnic cultural heritage. The film centers on Zein’s wedding as a micro-narrative reflecting Sudanese village life\, illustrating the transformations and complexities following Sudan’s 1956 independence\, and engaging with themes such as postcolonial evolution\, feminism\, religion\, and cultural diversity. Despite its critical acclaim and international recognition\, the film’s external directorship sparked debates regarding cultural authenticity; nevertheless\, it remains significant for its role in globally promoting Sudanese culture. His paper aims to connect this film to contemporary Sudanese cinematic works\, emphasizing ongoing efforts to restore and analyze its legacy\, and advocating for cinema as a catalyst for cultural dialogue and peaceful coexistence in modern Sudan. \n\nSamar Abdelrahman then presented “Repairing the Audiovisual Archive: Hussein Shariffe\,” which is rooted in a multidisciplinary project. This initiative focuses on developing practice-based approaches to African audiovisual heritage restitution through transnational collaborations among partners from Sudan\, Egypt\, Germany\, and the UK. She highlighted the severe threats confronting Africa’s cinematic heritage due to historical\, political\, and infrastructural challenges\, particularly in Sudan. She posited a redefinition of restitution as “archival repair\,” characterizing it as a participatory\, justice-oriented process that prioritizes preservation\, creative access\, and the empowerment of affected communities over the mere repatriation of physical artifacts. Utilizing the Hussein Shariffe archive as a central case study\, her work seeks to demonstrate how archival survival is intricately linked to issues of displacement\, diasporic memory\, and intergenerational cultural transmission. The project challenges conventional models of restitution\, instead advocating for innovative forms of access\, engagement\, and collaboration that address current crises while fostering opportunities for Sudanese cinema’s creative future and intergenerational dialogue. \n\nFollowing this\, Abdelrahman Elbashir presented “Sudanese Cinema: A Retrospective Archaeology\,” which investigates Sudanese cinema as a crucial cultural and urban phenomenon that shaped social life and collective identity throughout the 20th century. He emphasized cinema theaters as distinctive architectural forms and civic spaces\, integral to Sudan’s urban fabric and modernist aspirations\, particularly through open-air\, climate-adapted designs. His work documents the decline of this cinematic culture due to political instability\, censorship\, and neglect\, leaving behind deteriorating theaters and fragmented archives that serve as potent cultural artifacts. Methodologically framed as retrospective archaeology\, the paper incorporates photographic surveys\, spatial analyses\, and a 3D digital reconstruction of a pivotal theater to reinterpret these remnants. He underscored the imperative for preserving and critically analyzing cinema heritage within Sudan’s broader cultural history and urbanism\, also stressing the leveraging of this heritage in post-conflict urban restoration\, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue on cinema as urban infrastructure\, architecture as cultural memory\, and the potential role of cultural preservation in rebuilding Sudanese society. \n\nFrédérique Cifuentes presented “Cinema in Sudan and Its Legacy\,” a multimedia project exploring Sudan’s cinematic history through outdoor cinema houses\, pioneering filmmakers like Gadalla Gubara\, and the Sudanese Film Group. Her work\, originating from photographic research of Khartoum’s cinema architecture\, aims to preserve this distinctive cultural heritage. The presentation delved into the colonial origins of photography and cinema in Sudan\, highlighting their role in documenting and shaping national identity\, and underscoring the fragility of these historical archives. She detailed Gubara’s impactful career\, from photographer to a pivotal figure in Sudanese cinema\, whose work transitioned from government roles to independent productions. \n\nHatim Eujayl then discussed “The Mother\, The Farmer\, and the Sheikh: Cinematic Portrayals of Rural Central Sudan\,” which analyzes how four films—The Tomb (1977)\, You Will Die at Twenty (2019)\, Al-Sit (2020)\, and Cotton Queen (2025)—depict life in agricultural villages along the Blue Nile. The paper aims to explore how these films utilize cinematic techniques to construct ideas of regional and national identity through portrayals of gender\, religion\, economy\, and tradition. Eujayl argued that rural central Sudan is frequently presented as the archetype of Sudanese authenticity\, simultaneously idyllic and patriarchal\, where young protagonists challenge entrenched social norms. By examining production contexts\, filmmaker perspectives\, and ideological messaging\, he seeks to uncover how depictions of this region reflect broader political and cultural narratives. Ultimately\, the work aims to establish a framework for analyzing regional representation in Sudanese cinema\, advancing understanding beyond national generalizations toward nuanced regional study. \n\nDanya Elmalik explored “Sudanese Cinema and the Archive of Tomorrow\,” which investigated the fragile relationship between Sudanese cinema and archival preservation\, focusing on the erasure\, loss\, and revival of Sudan’s film heritage. Utilizing Suhaib Gasmelbari’s Talking About Trees (2019) and Sudan’s Forgotten Films (2017) as case studies\, the paper aims to examine how films themselves become archives in the absence of formal preservation systems. Drawing on theories such as Schwartz and Cook’s concept of “archives and power” and Marie-Aude Fouéré’s idea of “film as archive\,” she contended that Sudanese films now function as cultural records and memory keepers amidst political and economic instability. The paper will highlight the importance of access and digitization\, referencing Caroline Frick’s notion of “access as preservation\,” to counteract the marginalization of Sudanese history. Ultimately\, she frames this work as part of a broader endeavor to safeguard and reimagine Sudan’s cinematic and cultural memory—the “archive of tomorrow.” \n\nUmloda Ibrahim’s presentation\, “Return of Sudanese Cinema and its Aesthetics of Resistance\,” traced the historical evolution and political dimensions of Sudanese filmmaking\, from its colonial introduction to its post-independence growth\, decline\, and present-day revival. She elucidated how contemporary Sudanese and diasporic filmmakers express resistance and identity through cinema. Analyzing Our Beloved Sudan (2012)\, Al-Sit (2020)\, and You Will Die at Twenty (2019)\, she argued that diasporic filmmakers employ the concept of “homeplace” as a radical political space\, shaped by displacement\, exile\, and hybrid identity. Drawing on Hamid Naficy’s theory of “accented cinema” and bell hooks’ idea of the home as a site of resistance\, the paper aims to explore how gender\, colonialism\, and cultural memory intersect within Sudanese cinematic narratives. \n\nMamoun Eltlib subsequently traced the rise and decline of Sudanese cinema with his presentation\, “Sudanese Cinema: Intersections of Politics and the Dream of the City.” Using personal interviews and historical research\, he explained how political events such as socialist-nationalist shifts\, Sharia law enforcement\, and suppression under the National Islamic Front\, profoundly shaped film culture and institutions in Sudan. His work will illustrate the distinct histories of El-Obeid and Atbara\, highlighting the cultural vibrancy and civic role of their cinemas before state interventions and censorship began eroding the industry in the 1970s. Interviewees identified the nationalization of film distribution as the onset of cinema’s collapse\, exacerbated by a lack of institutional support and creative freedom. The enduring appeal of Indian popular films offered solace to marginalized groups as local production diminished. The paper will consider how the Sudanese “Dream of the City”—reflected in the symbolic place of cinema—can only be fully realized in a true democracy and remains central to Sudan’s collective aspirations for cultural renewal. \n\nIn a subsequent session\, Raga Makawi and Abubakr Omer analyzed Sudanese image-making in film with their presentation\, “Literal Death or Symbolism\, the Liberalization of Political Meaning-Making in Sudanese Films.” They highlighted the historically obscure and politically charged nature of Sudanese cinema\, examining the sociopolitical context of the 1970s when cultural productivity was dominated by poetry and music\, with film largely absent as a medium for reflecting Sudanese history and future. Since the political opening following the 2005 Peace Agreement\, Sudanese filmmaking has expanded\, particularly in Khartoum\, primarily fueled by donor-funded projects aligned with liberal narratives focusing on conflict and resistance. Using the 2019 film You Will Die at 20 as a case study\, they scrutinized the tension between local meaning-making and international reception\, suggesting that Sudanese filmmakers adapt narratives to conform to dominant global liberal discourses\, often resulting in simplified or orientalized interpretations. The paper proposes the development of oral mapping tools to recover richer local epistemologies in Sudanese cinema\, aiming to balance external influences with authentic cultural expression and political storytelling. The research is scheduled to proceed through workshops\, literature reviews\, and data collection through early 2026. \n\nRoman Deckert investigated Sudanese cinema from the perspective of German-language sources with “Sudanese Cinema Behind the German Language Barrier\,” which highlighted Germany’s historically significant yet often overlooked role in Sudanese cultural relations. His work aims to overcome the “German language barrier” by systematically researching archival materials in Germany\, Austria\, and Switzerland pertaining to Sudanese cinema\, including Cold War-era cultural exchanges between the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and the German Democratic Republic (GDR) that involved Sudan. Key foci include the biography of Mahjub bin Adam Mohamed\, an early Sudanese actor in German films\, and the influence of controversial figures such as Leni Riefenstahl on Sudanese film. The paper will also explore German contributions\, such as the establishment of television in Sudan and film education. Additionally\, it will review private archives and rarely seen film footage\, revealing complex layers of Sudanese cinematic history connected to German-speaking countries. \n\nSarra Idris’s presentation\, “Double Vision: From Imperial Gaze to Intimate Knowing in Sudanese Cinema\,” explored how Sudan’s cinematic representation has evolved from colonial distortion to self-authored storytelling. She traced early depictions\, such as Khartoum (1966)\, which glorified British imperialism while dehumanizing Sudanese characters through caricature and erasure. Even later humanitarian films like The Good Lie (2014) perpetuated the “white savior” trope\, centering Western emotional narratives. In contrast\, contemporary Sudanese filmmakers reclaim their image\, crafting works rooted in memory\, resistance\, and authenticity despite censorship and resource constraints. Framed through W.E.B. Du Bois’s concept of “double consciousness\,” she introduced “double vision”—the tension between Western portrayals and her own lived knowledge as a Sudanese raised partly in the West. Her paper aims to bridge academic analysis and personal reflection\, interrogating how film shapes cultural self-perception and exploring cinema as both a site of historical trauma and reclamation. \n\nRoopa Gogineni’s session\, “Politics of Collective Filmmaking and Distribution in Sudan\,” explored how Sudanese filmmakers utilize collective labor and mutual aid (nafeer) to produce and distribute films amidst censorship\, displacement\, and war. Drawing on her experience as a documentary filmmaker and coordinator of a mobile cinema network\, she employed practice-based research combining oral histories\, film analysis\, and field observation. She highlighted grassroots initiatives\, such as the Kiryandongo Refugee Settlement’s mobile cinema club\, which screens films for large refugee audiences and fosters collaborative production. These community-driven practices transform filmmaking into a political and pedagogical act\, creating shared spaces for dialogue and cultural resistance. By comparing Sudanese collectives with similar movements in Nigeria\, Syria\, Brazil\, and India\, she situated them within global traditions of Third Cinema and activist filmmaking. Her work aims to reframe cinema as a collective infrastructure for social movements\, emphasizing collaboration\, mobility\, and cultural self-determination beyond state and market control. \n\nIn the subsequent session\, Leena Habiballa discussed “Gendered Representations in Sudanese Cinema\,” examining how portrayals of gender and the subaltern in Sudanese films from the 1970s to the present mirror the nation’s shifting social and political realities. Early cinema\, exemplified by Gadalla Gubara’s Tajouje (1977)\, reinforced patriarchal ideals of stoic masculinity. In contrast\, recent films such as You Will Die at Twenty (2019) and Goodbye Julia (2023) challenge these norms by presenting emotionally complex male characters grappling with social change and instability. The rise of women filmmakers\, notably Marwa Zein with Khartoum Offside (2019)\, has further transformed representation\, foregrounding agency\, solidarity\, and resistance by subaltern groups against patriarchal and state oppression. She argued that these evolving depictions signify a critical reimagining of gender and the subaltern in Sudanese cinema\, where the voices of these groups increasingly shape national narratives and redefine cultural understandings of identity\, power\, and belonging. \n\nNext\, Taghreed Elsanhouri presented “Our Beloved Sudan: Reflexive Ethnographic Enquiry on the Filming of Sudan’s Partition.” She addressed her ethnographically inspired approach to documenting Sudan’s partition through her film Our Beloved Sudan. The project explores how the 2011 South Sudanese self-determination referendum redefined conceptualizations of Sudan as a nation\, intertwining public and private narratives by engaging political figures and an ordinary mixed-race family experiencing national division. She emphasized a dialogic process\, treating filmic inquiry as an ethnographic encounter\, examining how Sudanese people articulate nationhood\, memory\, and identity at a historical crossroads. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from Edward Said and Bakhtin\, she investigated how different voices\, both dominant and marginalized\, participate in constructing or challenging national identity\, emphasizing situated\, often contradictory\, perspectives. \n\nMohanad Hashim explored the historical and contemporary challenges facing Sudanese cinema with his presentation\, “The Quest for a Sudanese Cinema.” He highlighted the scarcity of archives and resources\, exacerbated by the impact of the 2023 war. Historically\, Sudanese cinema experienced brief state support in the 1970s and a recent resurgence led by young diaspora and local artists. Early film culture\, dating back to 1911 with screenings in El-Obied and flourishing in Khartoum and Omdurman by the 1940s\, featured cinema as both entertainment and a political instrument\, notably during World War II when colonial authorities used film for mobilization. He stressed the dearth of research on Sudanese audiences\, their viewing habits\, taste formation\, and socio-political influences. He proposes to investigate cinema appreciation and consumption through archival newspapers\, magazines\, and other sources\, aiming to understand how Sudanese cinephiles navigated scarcity\, class divides\, urban politics\, and national identity formation amidst structural challenges to the cinema industry. \n\nRazan Idris presented “Sudanese Filmmakers and Egyptian Audiences: From Decolonization to Displacement\,” which examined the often-overlooked history of Sudanese filmmakers working in Egypt throughout the 20th century and their representation of Sudanese identities to Egyptian audiences. She revealed that the well-known Sudanese filmmaker Saeed Hamed directed the 1998 Egyptian film An Upper Egyptian in the American University\, which contains anti-Black stereotypes criticized across the Arab world. Her work seeks to uncover how Sudanese filmmakers\, many of whom studied or lived in Egypt\, have navigated racial\, cultural\, and political dynamics in their films\, both during Sudan’s national struggles and periods of exile. The paper will highlight Sudanese cinema’s diasporic nature\, where displaced filmmakers produce work in Egypt\, engaging with themes of identity\, displacement\, and representation amidst political turmoil. The aim is to excavate lost films and histories\, questioning how Sudanese cinema abroad has shaped perceptions of Sudanese identity and how this legacy can inform future filmmaking practices within and beyond Sudan.In the final session\, Mai Abusalih examined “Khartoum (2025): The City as the Sixth Protagonist\,” portraying it as both a documentary portrait of five residents and an exploration of the city as a “sixth protagonist\,” shaping their experiences amidst political upheaval. Filmed between the 2019 revolution and the 2021 military coup\, the work documents Khartoum’s transition toward intensified militarization and the disruptions that preceded the 2023 war. Through street-level perspectives\, the film employs walking as a narrative method to reveal how spatial hierarchies\, planning politics\, and everyday urban informalities structure life in the capital. Juxtapositions between marginalized peripheries such as Jabarona\, an area historically housing displaced communities\, and central protest sites highlight the city’s entrenched social inequalities and contested notions of citizenship. Constraints imposed by surveillance and censorship shaped the film’s iPhone-based production\, underscoring the tension between public space and state control. She will utilize interviews\, mapping\, and comparative cinematic analysis to interrogate representation\, agency\, and the right to the city. \n\n\nTo view the working group agenda\, click here\n\n\n\nTo read the participants’ biographies\, click here\n\n\n\nRead more about this research initiative\n\n\nParticipants and Discussants:  \n\n\nSamar Abdel-Rahman\, University of Liverpool\n\n\n\nBayan Abubakr\, PhD candidate\,Yale University\n\n\n\nMai Abusalih\, Dcomomo Sudan | Modern Sudan Collective\n\n\n\nKhalid Ali\, Brighton and Sussex Medical School\n\n\n\nZahra Babar\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nMisba Bhatti\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nKhalid Albaih\, Artist in Residence\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nFrédérique Cifuentes-Morgan\n\n\n\nMaryam Daud\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nRoman Deckert\, Media in Cooperation and Transition (MiCT) \n\n\n\nDanya Elmalik\n\n\n\nAbdelrahman Elbashir\, \n\n\n\nTaghreed Elsanhouri\, \n\n\n\nMamoun Eltlib\n\n\n\nHatim Eujayl\n\n\n\nRoopa Gogineni\n\n\n\nLeena Habiballa\n\n\n\nMohanad Hashim\, BBC\n\n\n\nNoor Hussain\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nRazan Idris\, University of Pennsylvania\n\n\n\nSarra Idris\n\n\n\nUmloda Ibrahim\n\n\n\nRaga Makawi\, London School of Economics and Political Science \n\n\n\nSuzi Mirgani\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nAbubakr Omer\n\n\n\nSabreen Taha\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\nArticle by Misba Bhatti\, Research Analyst\, CIRS
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/sudan-in-the-picture-research-on-sudanese-cinema-workshop-i/
CATEGORIES:Sudan
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/11/2025_10_30-CIRS_HR-54-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251110T130000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251110T140000
DTSTAMP:20260413T052340
CREATED:20251028T121509Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251123T105940Z
UID:10001587-1762779600-1762783200@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:Launch Event: Migrant Stories from Qatar
DESCRIPTION:Join us for the launch of the Migrant Stories from Qatar project website! \n\nThis project brings together oral histories from migrant workers across Qatar\, offering rare insight into their lived experiences and contributions to the country’s social and economic fabric. The six principal investigators will reflect on the research process\, its findings\, and the broader significance of archiving migrant voices in Qatar\, an endeavor that seeks to reframe narratives of labor\, belonging\, and memory in the Gulf. \n\n\nMore info\n\n\nOn November 10\, the Center for International and Regional Studies held the official launch of the Migrant Stories in Qatar project website\, a digital platform dedicated to preserving and sharing the lived experiences of migrant workers in Qatar. Conceived as a long–term public resource\, the project curates oral histories\, testimonials\, and personal narratives that illuminate the social worlds\, aspirations\, and challenges of the migrant communities whose labor has shaped the contemporary Gulf. It seeks to democratize knowledge production by placing migrant workers not merely as subjects of study\, but as active contributors and curators of their own histories. \n\nZahra Babar\, the project emerged from intimate exchanges with migrants and from frustration with how their voices are routinely mediated\, silenced\, or reduced to anonymous data points. The website functions as a counter archive that democratizes knowledge production by coproducing narratives with migrant workers themselves and making these stories accessible to migrants\, their families\, and wider publics. \n\nSpeakers at the launch highlighted the project’s methodological\, ethical\, and political stakes. Trish Kahle and Nadya Sbaiti situated the archive within broader efforts to document global south histories at a time when formal state archives remain inaccessible\, arguing that migrant narratives reveal migrants not as marginal to the Gulf\, but as central to its social and economic order.  \n\nNoha Aboueldahab drew attention to the global significance of these testimonies\, observing that themes of law\, its absence\, and its uneven application recur across the interviews. She argued that oral histories offer multiple truths that complicate existing legal narratives and have important implications for fields such as international law and transitional justice. Integrating such testimonies into legal analysis\, she suggested\, could transform understandings of rights\, accountability\, and lived experience. \n\nThe project also involves extensive technical and linguistic labor. Suzi Migani\, responsible for recording and editing the English–language podcasts\, spoke about the logistical challenges of conducting interviews and the delicate process of editing without inadvertently shaping the narrative. She explained that the platform provides two versions of each interview: a full recording with only identifying details removed\, and a shorter public podcast episode of approximately fifteen minutes. Misba Bhatti\, who leads editing in hindustaani\, described the complexity of translation and the responsibility to convey meaning and emotion with accuracy and integrity. \n\nTogether\, these interventions articulate Migrant Stories in Qatar as both an archive and a collaborative intellectual project that reclaims authorship for migrant workers in and beyond Qatar.
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/launch-event-migrant-stories-from-qatar/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/10/Copy-of-Launch-of-Migrant-Storie-2.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251111T130000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251111T140000
DTSTAMP:20260413T052340
CREATED:20251028T131444Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251130T121712Z
UID:10001588-1762866000-1762869600@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:CIRS Lunch Talk: Masterclass with Professor Arjun Appadurai on "Global Cultural Flows"
DESCRIPTION:In the 1990’s\, the world began to see a massive growth in transnational traffic in images\, ideologies and commodities\, a process which popularized the term globalization. Today\, almost four decades later\, the world order is multipolar\, highly unstable and full of obstacles to free cultural flows. How can we interpret these changes? \n\nHosted by CIRS\, in collaboration with the Indian Ocean Studies Working Group\, this masterclass brings together scholars and students for an engaging discussion on the dynamics of globalization and cultural movement. Renowned anthropologist Arjun Appadurai will reflect on how people\, objects\, and ideas circulate across borders\, and how imagination\, media\, and markets shape these flows. Drawing on his influential works Modernity at Large\, The Social Life of Things\, Fear of Small Numbers\, and Banking on Words Professor Appadurai will offer a framework for understanding disjuncture\, modernity and power in the present moment.
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/cirs-lunch-talk-masterclass-with-professor-arjun-appadurai-on-global-cultural-flows/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/10/In-Collaboration-with-the-Indian-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251113T130000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20251113T140000
DTSTAMP:20260413T052340
CREATED:20251103T123243Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20251123T124618Z
UID:10001590-1763038800-1763042400@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:Laboring to Keep the Dead Alive: Commemoration and Social Reproduction in the Kurdish Movement
DESCRIPTION:Speaker: Marlene Schäfers\, Associate Professor\, Department of Cultural Anthropology\, Utrecht University \n\nOn November 13\, CIRS hosted a lunch talk in collaboration with the Critical Security Studies Hub at the Institute for Advanced Study in the Global South at Northwestern University\, titled “Labouring to Keep the Dead Alive: Commemoration and Social Reproduction in the Kurdish Movement.” \n\nIn this talk\, Dr Marlene Schäfers explored how the Kurdish movement understands and mobilizes martyrdom as a form of labour that sustains the community. Drawing on examples of funerals\, memorial ceremonies\, social media tributes\, and the production of “martyr albums\,” she showed that these practices constitute a vital mode of reproductive labour\, one that preserves continuity and identity when biological kinship cannot be relied upon.  \n\nWhat emerged clearly is that these acts of remembrance are not peripheral or decorative. They are central to how the movement reproduces itself. In contexts where traditional forms of kinship or biological reproduction cannot be relied upon\, especially in guerrilla camps marked by precarity and constant threat\, memory becomes a primary means of sustaining life. The speaker drew attention to the idea that narration itself becomes a reproductive act. Each story\, each obituary\, each ceremony extends the presence of the dead into the lives of the living. Through this narrative labour\, the community cultivates what one might call descendants or extended selves\, people whose identities form through their attachment to martyrs and to the struggle they represent. \n\nA striking quote from the presentation captured this ethos: “We have learned that there are other ways of multiplying.” In other words\, the reproduction of the community does not depend on producing biological offspring. Instead\, it comes from producing affective ties\, political commitment\, and a shared sense of continuity. As one Kurdish interlocutor explained\, “If you go to Kurdistan\, to Rojava\, and ask who Martyr Zîlan is\, everyone will tell you. In this way martyrdom becomes a means of reproducing the existence of the people\, and of the person herself.” Martyrs do not disappear; their memory generates new forms of political life. \n\nThe presentation also highlighted how internationalist volunteers in Rojava engage with this culture of martyrdom. For many of them\, the emotional and ethical demands of this form of commemoration require a departure from liberal Western assumptions that individual life is the highest good. Instead\, they are encouraged to adopt a long-term\, historical view: to understand their lives as part of a continuum that includes those who fought before them and those who will continue the struggle after. This shift in orientation is both necessary and unsettling. It asks individuals to situate their grief within a broader collective horizon. \n\nThis does not mean that death becomes easy. On the contrary\, participants repeatedly acknowledged that death remains bitter. One writer described rebelling against each new announcement of martyrdom\, asking\, “Why is there death? Are we condemned to lose our beautiful friends forever?” Even language seems insufficient. “No single word does justice to them\,” another wrote. The task of writing about the dead becomes a dilemma: if one writes\, the attempt feels inadequate; if one does not write\, the memory risks disappearing. This tension is precisely what pushes many to take up the pen again\, despite what they describe as their own lack of skill. Writing becomes a moral responsibility. \n\nUltimately\, the speaker argued that martyrdom in the Kurdish movement is not only a political symbol. It is a mechanism of social reproduction\, a way of keeping the community alive under conditions of war\, displacement\, and uncertainty. \n\nArticle by Maryam Daud\, Administrative Assistant at CIRS \n\n\n\n\nMarlene Schäfers is associate professor at the Department of Cultural Anthropology at Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Her research focuses on the impact of state violence on intimate and gendered lives\, voice and memory\, and the politics of death and the afterlife. She specializes in the anthropology of the Kurdish regions and modern Turkey. Her first monograph\, Voices that Matter: Kurdish Women at the Limits of Representation in Contemporary Turkey\, was published with the University of Chicago Press in 2023 and awarded the annual Book Prize of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association in 2024. 
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/laboring-to-keep-the-dead-alivecommemoration-and-social-reproduction-in-the-kurdish-movement/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/11/Marlene-Schafers-Associate-Profe-1.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR