BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Center for International and Regional Studies - ECPv6.15.15//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Center for International and Regional Studies
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Center for International and Regional Studies
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Qatar
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:+03
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260208T090000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260209T150000
DTSTAMP:20260429T112547
CREATED:20260308T094256Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260310T075450Z
UID:10001601-1770541200-1770649200@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:Rethinking Migration Categories from the Global South Workshop I
DESCRIPTION:On February 8 and 9\, 2026\, the Center for International and Regional Studies held a research workshop under its project\, Rethinking Migration Categories from the Global South. The purpose of the two-day meeting was to discuss and provide feedback on a collection of draft abstracts submitted for the project. Scholars\, working on the topic\, were convened for the meeting from around the globe. The topics discussed various aspects of developing theories around categories of migration that are centric to the Global South.   \n\nThe discussion was initiated by Payal Banerjee\, who examined how temporary visa systems transform migrants into specific legal categories that constrain their personhood and rights. She questioned what it means to be “documented\,” arguing that legal status involves restrictions and vulnerabilities rather than simply lawfulness. Her proposed paper aims to analyze temporary visa regimes in the US\, to understand how visa classifications create hierarchies among migrants and weaken their ability to challenge discrimination based on gender\, race\, or caste. The research positions visas as instruments of power that shape migrants’ social\, economic\, and political positioning in destination countries. \n\nIn the next session\, Rachel Silvey addressed how temporary migration regimes create “stuck movement\,” the paradoxical simultaneous production of mobility and immobility for low-wage foreign workers. Drawing on Massey’s “power geometries\,” she discussed three dimensions of im/mobility: spatial (border-crossing yet employer-tied)\, temporal (cyclical contracts creating perpetual temporariness)\, and social (international movement without occupational advancement). Workers experience involuntary immobility across the migration cycle\, waiting before departure\, confinement during contracts\, and stuckness after return. Her work will examine how legal documentation doesn’t guarantee true mobility\, as temporary workers face institutionalized uncertainty and precarity. This im/mobility framework reveals how contemporary migration governance relies on immobilization as a control technique. \n\nBrenda Yeoh talked about the concept of the “developmental migration state” in East and Southeast Asia\, where migration governance prioritizes economic development over individual rights. She highlighted how the state employs categorise and control strategies through: hierarchizing migrants by skill levels as proxies for developmental utility; managing degrees and varieties of temporariness to balance market demands with citizenship boundaries; controlling category conversion between migrant statuses; and creating legal versus permissive zones that can transform migrants from “illegal and precarious” to “legal yet precarious.” These power-knowledge techniques divide\, differentiate\, and discipline migrant populations\, reinforcing global hierarchies while obscuring racial and gender prejudices in migration management. \n\nMeron Zeleke then shifted the focus to Ethiopian female migrants in the UAE and how they strategically navigate a highly racialized labor market through skill acquisition and sectoral transitions. Challenging victimhood narratives\, she highlighted the female migrants’ agency as they invest in training\, from basic domestic skills to beauty industry certifications and marketing courses\, to improve their positioning within the UAE’s hierarchical capitalism. While migrants face systematic devaluation based on nationality rather than actual skills\, returnees use planned migration and skill upgrades as coping strategies. The research reveals how migrants exercise negotiated agency to achieve limited mobility within racialized structures\, though such strategies don’t fundamentally destabilize the racial order underlying labor market inequality. \n\nZahra Babar presented on the liberal/illiberal binary in migration scholarship that treats Gulf states as exceptional authoritarian cases while positioning liberal democracies as normative baselines. She argued that Western-centric frameworks overlook how liberal states also produce migrant precarity through detention\, deportation\, welfare exclusion\, and legal stratification. Rather than governance failures\, Gulf labor regimes\, including the kafala system\, reveal global logics that render migrants economically essential yet socially excluded. Her proposed work will use the Gulf as theory generating rather than exceptional case\, demonstrating structural continuities across political systems in producing differentiated membership and migrant vulnerability. \n\nIn the next session\, Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh examined critiques of three displacement categories\, refugee\, host\, and camp\, through Syrian\, Palestinian\, Iraqi\, Lebanese\, and Jordanian interlocutors’ perspectives in Lebanon and Jordan. Drawing on 450 interviews\, her work challenges bounded categorizations by demonstrating that refugees are hosts and hosts experience displacement\, proposing ‘refugee hosts’ as a concept highlighting agency and intersecting identities. Her paper will look at how these labels impose epistemic violence while also offering analytical tools to disentangle complex realities. Using Baddawi camp as a ‘more-than-camp’ hosting multiple displaced populations and ‘camps within camps\,’ the intervention aims to move beyond essentialized hierarchies toward relational understandings that recognize displacement’s inherently intertwined nature with hosting. \n\nBina Fernandez talked about theorizing protection for migrant domestic workers (MDWs) through a feminist international political economy lens on social reproduction. She argued that MDWs are constituted as precarious workers\, over-regulated through restrictive immigration policies yet under-regulated in labor protections\, serving employer and state interests within global capitalism. Her paper proposes analyzing MDW protection through assemblages of formal and informal social provisioning across origin and destination countries\, evaluating whether protections are transformative (replenishing social reproduction) or depleting. Key protection areas include abuse prevention\, labor exploitation\, health\, pregnancy/maternity\, social security\, and community-based support. The discussion emphasized that inadequate MDW protection isn’t oversight but structural design sustaining gendered\, racialized inequalities. \n\nAashsih Karn shifted the discussion towards Gulf migration and argued for situating the scholarship beyond suffering-centered approaches that reduce migrants to victims of exploitation. While acknowledging labor precarity under systems like Kafala\, his paper proposes analyzing Gulf cities as hybrid urban formations where non-citizen life is normalized rather than exceptional. The framework examines three interdependent processes: identity and belonging (how migrants position themselves in stratified urban worlds)\, place-making (symbolic anchoring of social location)\, and agency (collective practices sustaining migrant life). The paper aims to conceptualize Gulf cities as composed of distinctive migrant ecosystems\, dynamic social worlds characterized by proximity and boundaries\, and migrants as social actors who actively produce meaning and sociality under non-citizenship conditions. \n\nIn the next session\, Faisal Garba Muhammed expressed that mainstream migration studies misrepresent African migration and depict migrants as burdens driven by desperation. His paper aims to decenter Eurocentric frameworks that ignore intra-South mobility and African scholarship. He advocated historicizing migration as integral to African life\, not exceptional\, including examining the transatlantic slave trade’s legacy in contemporary migration regulation that “wants the body\, not the human.” He emphasized that migrants are collective actors in world-making and challenged the narrow nationalist belonging concepts. \n\nIn the last session\, Anushka Bose looked at passport acquisition as a categorical mobility strategy beyond physical migration. Her work analyzes three citizenship-by-investment programs (golden passports)\, strategic naturalization through temporary migration\, and ancestry-based acquisition as pathways that convert different resources\, financial capital\, time/bureaucratic compliance\, or kinship claims\, into second passports. Focusing on the GCC\, where passport nationality determines high-skilled workers’ salaries (Western passport holders earning the most\, followed by Middle Eastern\, then Asian nationals)\, she questions whether passports proxy for skill or credentials. She proposed treating diverse acquisition pathways as unified categorical mobility strategies\, examining how passport capital transforms labor market positioning\, especially for expatriates seeking stronger legal anchors while maintaining Gulf-based careers. \n\nThe final papers from this workshop will be published as a special issue of a journal by CIRS. \n\n\nTo view the working group agenda\, click here\n\n\n\nTo read the participants’ biographies\, click here\n\n\n\nRead more about this research initiative\n\n\nParticipants and Discussants:  \n\n\nZahra Babar\n\n\n\nPayal Banerjee\n\n\n\nMisba Bhatti\n\n\n\nAnuska Bose\n\n\n\nMaryam Daud\n\n\n\nNandini Deo\n\n\n\nMehek Elahi\n\n\n\nBina Fernandez\n\n\n\nFaisal Garba\n\n\n\nAmanda Garrett\n\n\n\nNoor Hussain\n\n\n\nSyed Taha Kaleem\n\n\n\nAashish Karn\n\n\n\nTorsten Menge\n\n\n\nSuzi Mirgani\n\n\n\nHonore Mugiraneza\n\n\n\nShyryn Nurlybek\n\n\n\nHaala Qamar\n\n\n\nElena Fiddian Qasmiyeh\n\n\n\nRachel Silvey\n\n\n\nSabreen Taha\n\n\n\nBrenda S.A. Yeoh FBA\n\n\n\nMeron Zeleke
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/rethinking-migration-categories-from-the-global-south/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/03/2026_02_08-CIRS_CIRS-Workshops_HR-0505-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260209T180000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260209T190000
DTSTAMP:20260429T112547
CREATED:20260128T105721Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260312T090617Z
UID:10001596-1770660000-1770663600@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:CIRS Monthly Dialogue: Asian Migration in a Global Context
DESCRIPTION:This public panel brings together scholars to examine how migration categories are produced\, governed\, and contested within Asia and across transnational flows from the Global South to the Global North. Moving beyond fixed labels such as migrant\, refugee\, skilled worker\, or trafficking victim\, the discussion explores how state policies\, visa regimes\, and labor markets shape mobility in practice. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOn February 9th\, the Center for International and Regional Studies CIRS hosted a public panel featuring scholars from the workshop Rethinking Migration Categories from the Global South. The discussion brought together three panelists\, Brenda Yeoh\, Payal Banerjee\, and Bina Fernandez\, to examine how migration regimes classify\, control\, and at times constrain those who move across borders\, with particular attention to perspectives from the Global South. \n\nBrenda Yeoh opened by mapping the dominance of temporary migration regimes across Asia\, where pathways to permanent residency or citizenship remain structurally inaccessible for low skilled workers. She critiqued Western centric paradigms in migration studies\, highlighting how mechanisms like enclavisation and enclosure\, the spatial segregation of migrants and the use of borders as instruments of discipline\, function to contain rather than include. Her central provocation was this: how do states design systems explicitly not to integrate migrants\, and how should scholars study migration not as states define it\, but as migrants actually experience it? \n\nPayal Banerjee drew on her research into Indian IT workers in the United States to examine the mechanics of status dependence\, the way a migrant’s legal and economic existence becomes tethered to a single employer. This produces structural vulnerability\, including precarious legal standing\, limited labor mobility\, and chronic anxiety. She connected these individual experiences to broader global asymmetries\, arguing that employer sponsored visa regimes are not incidental but deliberate\, and that the Indian tech sector’s deep reliance on Western markets reflects wider patterns in which Global South economies remain structurally dependent on Global North capital and labor demand. \n\nBina Fernandez challenged Eurocentric framings by repositioning Australia within the Asia Pacific region and introducing the concept of “uninvited migrants and settlers” to foreground colonial histories. She critiqued Australia’s offshore detention regime as a calculated deterrence strategy while also noting more hopeful developments\, such as the Australia Tuvalu bilateral agreement offering climate linked mobility pathways. She identified three migration regimes deserving particular critical attention: forced deportation regimes\, climate and disaster induced displacement\, and statelessness. \n\nThe panel’s discussion surfaced several cross cutting themes. Participants examined how migration governance increasingly treats human movement as a problem to be managed\, with administrative categories serving as tools of state control that generate waiting\, anxiety\, and unequal power. The rise of AI\, biometrics\, and surveillance technologies was described as double edged\, enhancing border enforcement while also enabling migrants to build digital networks and transnational communities. Panelists also interrogated the politics of labeling itself\, noting that categories like “refugee” or “skilled worker” carry colonial and racial histories\, and that the global skills hierarchy reframes exclusion through the language of merit. Finally\, feminist perspectives on social reproduction highlighted how migrant domestic workers effectively labor for two households simultaneously\, with migration redistributing care work globally along gendered and racialized lines. \n\nArticle by Maryam Daud\, CIRS administrative Assistant and Haala Qamar CIRS Student Assistant \n\nSpeakers: \n\n\nBrenda S.A. Yeoh FBA is Distinguished Professor\, National University of Singapore (NUS) and Migration and Mobilities Cluster\, at NUS’ Asia Research Institute. She was awarded the Vautrin Lud Prize for outstanding achievements in Geography in 2021 for her contributions to migration and transnationalism studies. Her research interests in Asian migrations span themes including social reproduction and care migration; skilled migration and cosmopolitanism; and marriage migrants and cultural politics. \n\n\n\nBina Fernandez is Professor in Development Studies at the University of Melbourne. She obtained PhD and MPhil degrees at the University of Oxford and has held academic positions at the University of Leeds\, the Institute of Development Studies\, Sussex\, the University of Oxford and the University of Oxford-Brookes. Bina’s research focuses on migration and social policy\, analysed through the feminist lens of social reproduction. For over a decade\, she has conducted multi-sited research on Ethiopian migrant domestic workers in the Middle East; key themes have been the conditions of work\, the care needs of migrants\, migrant mothers and their children at risk of statelessness. She has also undertaken research on Ethiopian refugees in Kenya and Australia. Current research on ‘Diaspora Humanitarians’ investigates the regenerative contributions of Australia-based migrant and refugee diasporas to the social reproduction of their homeland communities during times of crisis. \n\n\n\nPayal Banerjee is Professor of Sociology at Smith College\, USA. Her research focuses on the political economies of migration\, globalization\, and the role of policies in structuring labor incorporation\, migrant categories\, and status displacement. Banerjee’s work on Indian IT workers in the US has appeared in International Migration\, Critical Sociology\, Race\, Gender\, and Class\, International Feminist Journal of Politics\, Irish Journal of Anthropology\, Women’s Studies Quarterly\, Social & Public Policy Review\, Man in India\, and in several edited volumes. Banerjee’s publications on Chinese minorities in India have appeared in Security and Peace\, China Report\, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics\, Huaqiao Huaren Lishi Yanjiu (Overseas Chinese History Studies\, in Mandarin)\, and in the book Doing Time with Nehru. As a Borders Studies Group member\, she co-published India China: Rethinking Borders and Security. Banerjee served as a research fellow at the BRICS Policy Center in Rio de Janeiro\, Brazil; and\, taught at the Graduate Program in International Affairs\, The New School in New York City\, and in India at Sikkim University in Gangtok and at FLAME in Pune\, as visiting faculty. \n\n\nModerator: \n\n\nWaleed Ziad is Associate Professor of History at Georgetown University in Qatar. His research interests lie at the intersection of social history\, religious studies\, and anthropology. Professor Ziad’s scholarship examines the historical and philosophical foundations of Muslim revivalism and mysticism in South and Central Asia and Iran. In this endeavor\, he has conducted extensive fieldwork in over 140 towns across Afghanistan\, Pakistan\, and Uzbekistan. He is the author of Hidden Caliphate: Sufi Saints Beyond the Oxus and Indus (Harvard Press\, 2021)\, which won the prestigious Albert Hourani Prize given by the Middle East Studies Association of North America as well as the American Institute for Pakistan Studies 2022 Book Prize. His most recent book In the Treasure Room of the Sakra King: Votive Coinage from Gandharan Shrines (American Numismatic Society\, 2022) builds on his long-standing research into numismatics and material culture of the Indo-Iranian borderlands. His forthcoming book\, Sufi Masters of the Afghan Empire: Bibi Sahiba and Her Sacred Networks (Harvard Press)\, is a continuation of his core research on the development of Sufi networks\, spanning modern-day Afghanistan\, Uzbekistan\, Pakistan\, Tajikistan\, India\, China\, and Russia. He has also written extensively on historical and ideological trends in the Muslim world\, his work appearing in The New York Times\, International Herald Tribune\, The Wall Street Journal\, Foreign Policy\, Christian Science Monitor\, and The Hill. 
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/cirs-monthly-dialogue-asian-migration-in-a-global-context/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/01/Asian-Migration-in-a-Global-Cont-1.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260309T173000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260309T190000
DTSTAMP:20260429T112547
CREATED:20260224T103224Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260224T115526Z
UID:10001600-1773077400-1773082800@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:CIRS Monthly Dialogue: What Arab Authoritarianism Tells Us About the World
DESCRIPTION:rEGISTER nOW\n\n\nThis panel highlights contributions in the new Handbook on Authoritarianism in the Arab World\, forthcoming open access from Bloomsbury Politics. The Handbook highlights the specificities of authoritarianism in the Arab world while placing the region in the context of global trends. The panel will feature Dana Al Kurd (Associate Professor at University of Richmond) Yasmeen Mekawy (Assistant Professor at Northwestern Qatar)\, Alexei Abrahams (Assistant Professor at HBKU)\, and Abdullah Al Arian (Associate Professor at GU-Q)\, moderated by Diana Buttu\, to discuss trends in research on authoritarianism\, emotions in the Arab Spring uprisings\, and digital authoritarianism. \n\nModerator: \n\n\nDiana Buttu\, a Palestinian lawyer specializing in international law and human rights\, returns to GU-Q as a Practitioner-in-Residence for the academic year. She will teach Palestine and the Law and Negotiation and Organizational Conflict\, offering students a practitioner’s lens on diplomacy\, accountability\, and resistance. A former legal adviser to the Palestinian negotiating team and fellow at Stanford and Harvard\, she is a frequent commentator on Palestine and international law in global media.  \n\n\nSpeakers: \n\n\n\n\nDana El Kurd is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Richmond\, in Richmond\, Virginia\, USA. She specializes in Palestinian and Arab politics\, particularly on topics related to mobilization\, public opinion\, and international intervention. Her first book\, titled Polarized and Demobilized: Legacies of Authoritarianism in Palestine\, was published in January 2020 with Oxford University Press. Her work has been published in academic journals such as Global Studies Quarterly\, PS: Political Science & Politics\, and Democratization\, as well as media outlets such as The Nation\, Foreign Policy\, Jewish Currents\, Financial Times\, and more. El Kurd is a senior nonresident fellow at the Arab Center Washington\, and serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Palestine Studies as well as the Board of Directors of Jewish Currents.  \n\n\n\nAlexei Abrahams is an Assistant Professor of Digital Humanities at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Doha\, Qatar. His research examines information manipulation and cybersecurity using big data and social science methods\, with a current focus on designing digital observatories to assess the health of media ecosystems. His work has appeared in journals including Journal of Information Technology & Politics\, Political Science Research & Methods\, and International Journal of Communication\, and has informed reporting in outlets such as The New York Times\, The Washington Post\, The Guardian\, Al Jazeera\, Reuters\, and CBC News.Previously\, he served as Digital Lead for the Canadian Media Ecosystems Observatory at McGill University and held research fellowships at Harvard\, the University of Toronto\, Princeton University\, and UC San Diego. He earned his PhD in Economics from Brown University and frequently consults for the World Bank. \n\n\n\nYasmeen Mekawy is an Assistant Professor at Northwestern University in Qatar. She received her PhD in Political Science from the University of Chicago\, specializing in the comparative politics of the Middle East and North Africa. Her research and teaching focus on social movements and revolution\, digital media and popular culture\, and the politics of emotion. She examines how emotions mobilize and demobilize collective action\, and how affect circulates through social media and cultural forms. Her work has been published in Mediterranean Politics. She is currently working on her book project on the role of affect and emotion in the making and unmaking of Egypt’s 2011 revolution. affect circulates through social media and cultural forms. Her work has been published in Mediterranean Politics. She is currently working on her book project on the role of affect and emotion in the making and unmaking of Egypt’s 2011 revolution. \n\n\n\nAbdullah Al-Arian is Associate Professor of History at Georgetown University in Qatar wherehe specializes in the modern Middle East and the study of Islamic social movements. He is theauthor of Answering the Call: Popular Islamic Activism in Sadat’s Egypt\, editor of Football inthe Middle East: State\, Society\, and the Beautiful Game and co-editor of the forthcoming GlobalHistories and Practices of Islamophobia. He is also editor of the Critical Currents in Islam pageon the Jadaliyya e-zine.
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/cirs-monthly-dialogue-what-arab-authoritarianism-tells-us-about-the-world/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/02/CIRS_Arab_Authortarianism_Horizo-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260413T130000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260413T140000
DTSTAMP:20260429T112547
CREATED:20260203T124010Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260215T131215Z
UID:10001597-1776085200-1776088800@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:CIRS Book Talk: Halfway to Freedom: The Struggles and Strivings of African American in Washington\, DC by Maurice Jackson
DESCRIPTION:In Conversation with Professor Maurice Jackson \n\nThe book\, set to be published next year\, traces the struggles of African Americans for equality and human rights from 1780 to 2020. Through the history of Washington DC\, it shows how Black lived experiences\, political mobilization\, and resistance mirror broader national struggles. By centering the city as both a symbolic and material site of power\, the book tells the history of the United States through Black Washingtonians. \n\n\nMaurice Jackson  teaches in the History and African American Studies  Departments and is Affiliated Professor of Music (Jazz) at Georgetown University. Before coming to academe\, he worked as a longshoreman\, shipyard rigger\, construction worker and community organizer. He  is author of Let This Voice Be Heard: Anthony Benezet\, Father of Atlantic Abolitionism\, co-editor of African-Americans and the Haitian Revolution\, of Quakers and their Allies in the Abolitionist Cause\,1754-1808 and DC Jazz: Stories of Jazz Music in Washington\, DC. Jackson wrote the liner notes to the 2 jazz CDs by Charlie Haden and Hank Jones\, Steal Away: Spirituals\, Folks Songs and Hymns and Come Sunday. He has recently lectured in France\, Turkey\, Italy\, Puerto Rico\, and Qatar. He served on  Georgetown University Slavery Working Group. A 2009 inductee into the Washington\, D.C. Hall of Fame he was appointed by the Mayor and the DC Council as Inaugural Chair of the DC Commission on African American Affairs (2013-16) and presented “An Analysis: African American Employment\, Population & Housing Trends in Washington\, D.C.” to the Mayor and elected leaders of the D.C. government in 2017. He is completing work on Halfway to Freedom: The Struggles and Strivings of African American in Washington\, DC to be published by Duke University Press. His next books will be We Knew No Other Way: The Many-Sided Struggle for Freedom and  Black Radicalism: A Very Short Introduction.
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/cirs-book-talk-halfway-to-freedom-the-struggles-and-strivings-of-african-american-in-washington-dc-by-maurice-jackson/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/02/In-Converstaion-with-Professor-M-3.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260415T080000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260415T170000
DTSTAMP:20260429T112547
CREATED:20251001T125551Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260218T105357Z
UID:10001583-1776240000-1776272400@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:(Re)Collecting Sudan: Art and Culture Archives Workshop II
DESCRIPTION:On September 21\, 2025\, the Center for International and Regional Studies (CIRS) hosted its second workshop for the “(Re)Collecting Sudan: Art and Culture Archives” research initiative. ​This workshop served as a platform for project contributors to engage in detailed discussions and receive constructive feedback on their submitted papers.  \n\nTo ensure a thorough review process and provide robust feedback for all submissions\, the workshop was organized into five thematically focused sessions. These sessions included Historical Archives\, Digital Archives\, Art Archives\, Lyrical Archives\, and Archives of Exile. This strategic segmentation allowed for in-depth engagement with each paper\, ensuring that discussions were contextualized within their specific scholarly domains and fostering specialized insights. \n\nThe “Historical Archives” section initiated the discussions\, featuring two prominent papers. Eiman Hussein\, Talal Afifi\, and Erica Carter’s paper “Experiencing Hussein Shariffe: Encounters with the Archives—A Collective Auto-Ethnography\,” offered a unique\, shared exploration of historical interactions. This was followed by Ahmad Sikainga’s “The Archives of Leisure and Popular Culture in Colonial and Post-Colonial Khartoum\,” which meticulously examined the cultural nuances preserved within these historical records. \n\nTransitioning to contemporary approaches\, the “Digital Archives” session showcased three insightful papers. Amna Elidrissy\, Zainab Gaafar\, and Helen Mallinson co-authored “Live Museums: An Ecosystem for Safeguarding Heritage\,” highlighting innovative digital platforms for cultural preservation. Larissa-Diana Fuhrmann and Aya Hassan then explored modern archiving in “Instagram as Archive: Sudanese Artists and Political Memory\,” demonstrating the role of social media in capturing historical narratives. The session concluded with Marilyn Deegan\, Wahbi Abdalfattah Abdalrahman\, and Locale’s “Sudan Memory: Building and Narrating the Digital Archive\,” detailing efforts in constructing comprehensive digital repositories. \n\nFurther expanding the scope\, the “Art Archives” session addressed the intersection of art and historical documentation through two compelling papers. Reem Aljeally and Katarzyna Grabska’s “Accidental Archiving? Questioning Curation and Research as Forms of Archiving in the Midst of Political Violence and War in Sudan” critically examined spontaneous archiving practices during conflict. Rahiem Shadad then presented “What Can We Learn from Sudan’s Collective Image-Making History?” emphasizing the value of visual cultural heritage.  \n\nThe “Lyrical Archives” session highlighted the power of oral and poetic traditions\, featuring Qutouf Elobaid’s “Songs of the Barracks: Sudanese Poetic Archives of the 2018 December Revolution\,” and Ruba El Melik and Reem Abbas’s “Women Archiving Sudan: How Women Use Fashion\, Songs\, and Poetry to Preserve History\,” both illustrating the profound role of lyrical expression in documenting historical events.  \n\nThe workshop concluded with the “Archives of Exile” session\, which explored the preservation of cultural memory in diaspora. Bentley Brown’s paper\, “Despite the Distance Between Us: Attempts to Preserve Cultural Memory through Filmmaking-in-Exile\,” showcased cinematic endeavors to bridge geographical divides. Finally\, Anna Reumert’s “An Archive of Exile: Sudanese Migrant Labor and Political Solidarity in Lebanon” shed light on the archival significance of migrant experiences and collective action. \n\nThe final revised drafts will be collected by CIRS with an aim of publishing either an edited volume or a special issue of a journal in the future. \n\n\nTo view the working group agenda\, click here\n\n\n\nRead more about this research initiative\n\n\nParticipants and Discussants:  \n\n\nWahbi Abdulrahman\, Nile Valley University\, Sudan\n\n\n\nRund Alarabi\, The Städelschule (Hochschule für Bildende Künste)\, Germany\n\n\n\nMuez Ali\, Earthna: Center for a Sustainable Future at Qatar Foundation\n\n\n\nReem Aljeally\, The Muse Multi Studios\n\n\n\nZahra Babar\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nMisba Bhatti\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nBentley Brown\, American University of Sharjah\n\n\n\nErica Carter\, King’s College\n\n\n\nMarilyn Deegan\, King’s College\n\n\n\nAmna Elidrissy\, Safeguarding Sudan’s Living Heritage (SSLH)\n\n\n\nRuba El Melik\, Independent Researcher\n\n\n\nQutouf Elobaid\, Locale\n\n\n\nNafisa Eltahir\, Locale\n\n\n\nLarissa-Diana Fuhrmann\, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt\n\n\n\nKatarzyna Grabska\, University of Geneva\n\n\n\nSuha Hasan\, Mawane\n\n\n\nAya Hassan\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nNoor Hussain\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nEiman Hussein\, King’s College\n\n\n\nAla Kheir\, Independent Researcher\n\n\n\nHelen Mallinson\, Safeguarding Sudan’s Living Heritage (SSLH)\n\n\n\nSuzi Mirgani\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\n\nAnna Simone Ruemert\, The New School\, US\n\n\n\nRahiem Shadad\, Downtown Gallery\n\n\n\nAala Sharfi\, Locale\n\n\n\nOmnia Shawkat\, Andariya\n\n\n\nHaneen Sidhahmed\, Sudan Tapes Archive\n\n\n\nAhmad Sikainga\, Ohio State University\n\n\n\nSabreen Taha\, CIRS\, Georgetown University in Qatar\n\n\nArticle by CIRS Research Analyst Misba Bhatti
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/recollecting-sudan-art-and-culture-archives-workshop-ii/
CATEGORIES:Sudan
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/04/2025_04_11-CIRS_Re-Collecting-Sudan-Art-and-Culture-Archives-43.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260419T133000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Qatar:20260420T130000
DTSTAMP:20260429T112547
CREATED:20260429T071220Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260429T071221Z
UID:10001604-1776605400-1776690000@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:Political Economy of Development in Sudan: A Historical View of Economic Relations\, Trade\, and Informality Workshop I
DESCRIPTION:On April 19–20\, 2026\, the Center for International and Regional Studies (CIRS) held a hybrid research meeting under its project\, “Political Economy of Development in Sudan: A Historical View of Economic Relations\, Trade\, and Informality.” The aim of the meeting was to discuss and provide in-depth feedback on the draft abstracts submitted by participants for the project.  \n\nThe discussion was initiated by Ahmed Kodouda\, who traced Sudan’s chronic underdevelopment from the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium (1899-1956) through the April 2023 civil war. He stated that developmental failures stemmed from a self-reinforcing cycle of extractive colonial institutions and elite capture reproduced across successive regimes. The colonial political economy concentrated wealth in the Nile corridor and cultivated a narrow northern elite that inherited and deepened these structures after independence. Successive military regimes entrenched center-periphery inequalities\, while organized labor\, the primary counter-force\, was systematically dismantled. The Islamist-neoliberal era of the al-Bashir government further commodified the state through oil rents and patronage networks\, ultimately spawning the Rapid Support Forces (RSF)\, which collapsed the center from within in 2023. His study highlights how path-dependent institutional legacies\, elite manipulation of political order\, the suppression of developmental alternatives\, and the militarization of economic resources collectively made Sudan’s trajectory of state collapse not merely predictable\, but historically inevitable. \n\nIn the next session\, Hamid Ali examined how successive economic reform strategies in Sudan\, spanning state-led development\, neoliberal liberalization\, and post-secession stabilization\, interacted with institutional weakness and political conflict to shape long-term economic outcomes. He highlighted three distinct phases: the failure of ambitious post-independence planning due to weak administrative capacity; the partial gains of 1990s market liberalization that produced macroeconomic stabilization without structural transformation; and the post-2011 “reform-instability trap\,” where austerity deepened social pressures and ultimately contributed to state collapse. His study examines three core hypotheses linking weak institutions\, political exclusion\, and resource dependency to poor growth outcomes\, and proposes that reforms divorced from institutional development and political legitimacy are inherently unsustainable. \n\nAlden Young then reviewed the relationship between long-distance trade and state formation in the Nile Valley from the founding of the Funj Sultanate in 1504 through the Ottoman-Egyptian conquest of 1820–1824. Challenging the tendency to treat the precolonial era as static\, his study defines an “early modern period” in northeast African history\, beginning with the dissolution of the Treaty of Baqt and the rise of the Funj\, characterized by dynamic\, shifting trade orientations across the Sahel\, Red Sea\, and Ethiopian highlands rather than the traditional north-south Nile axis. The paper focuses on how the trade patterns and state-formation dynamics of this era established enduring geopolitical templates that continued to shape colonial and postcolonial Sudan. Furthermore\, it foregrounds that colonial inheritances are not the sole determinants of Sudan’s contemporary condition\, and that understanding its early modern period is essential for rethinking the deeper structural roots of the country’s persistent instability. \n\nNext\, Mazin Abdullah examined Sudan’s post-independence economic policy from 1956 to 1972\, arguing that its developmental failures cannot be reduced to ideological vacillation or misguided import-substitution strategies alone. Instead\, it advances a dual analytical framework centered on path dependence and economic performativity. Sudan’s exclusion from the Sterling Area after 1947 created a chronic hard-currency crisis that compelled planners to maximize agricultural exports\, while a deeply internalized “hydraulic civilization” mindset led them to equate national prosperity with Nile-corridor irrigation. His paper focuses on how these two forces converged to produce economic policies\, including the Ten-Year Development Plan\, sweeping nationalizations in 1970\, and the Unregistered Land Act\, that actively rendered Sudan’s peripheral regions economically invisible\, concentrating investment in Khartoum and the riverain core. In doing so\, it highlights how colonial monetary inheritance and planners’ cognitive frameworks jointly cemented the structural patterns of spatial inequality and peripheral marginalization that continue to define Sudan’s crises today. \n\nMunzoul Assal shifted the discussion towards the evolving role of the Sudanese diaspora and refugee populations in Sudan’s development by situating remittances within a broader framework of transnational practices that includes knowledge transfer\, charitable giving\, and political engagement. He argued that remittances\, while providing critical household-level stability\, can simultaneously create welfare dependency and erode state responsibility for social services. His paper focuses on how successive macro-crises\, including civil wars\, South Sudan’s secession\, and the April 2023 war\, have reconfigured migration patterns\, diaspora composition\, and cross-border resource flows. Drawing on secondary remittance data\, policy documents\, and interviews with migrants and refugees\, and positioning itself at the intersection of migration-development theory\, forced migration studies\, diaspora transnationalism\, and Sudan’s political economy\, the work maps the institutional frameworks and political arrangements that determine whether diaspora and refugee engagement produce genuine developmental transformation or merely sustain coping mechanisms in a fragile state. \n\nCJ Pine investigated the illicit financing strategies of Darfurian armed groups from 2006 to 2025\, drawing primarily on the underutilized annual reports of the UN Panel of Experts established under the 1591 sanctions regime. He argued that debates over sanctions on Sudan\, whether led by the U.S. or UN\, have insufficiently engaged with how armed groups’ informal economies are both deeply entrenched in local structures and highly adaptable to external pressure. Recurring financing mechanisms identified include cross-border contraband\, gold mining\, criminal extortion\, and vehicle checkpoint robberies. His work focuses on tracing whether armed groups have maintained consistent or shifting financing strategies over time\, how government actions\, such as fuel restrictions and expanded black markets\, and the Security Council have failed to systematically respond to the Panel’s findings. The study highlights that durable peace requires combining external leverage with economic inclusion frameworks that address the structural drivers sustaining Darfur’s conflict economies. \n\nIn the next session\, Nirsin Elamin examined the political economy of agriculture in central Sudan\, using the Gezira region as its primary lens to trace how colonial land tenure systems and labor regimes have been continuously reproduced\, rather than dismantled\, by successive post-independence governments. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in villages along the Blue Nile between 2013 and 2018\, she argued that large-scale land investments\, neoliberal privatization\, and crony capitalism under the al-Bashir regime systematically dispossessed smallholder farmers and herders\, generating a surplus\, flexible\, and gendered labor force absorbed into extractive industries and the security state. Her paper focuses on the roles of local capital\, the Agricultural Bank of Sudan’s discriminatory lending\, and the co-constitution of domestic and foreign elite interests in driving land dispossession and fueling conflict. The study considers what land justice might look like\, drawing on testimonies from communities who have endured successive cycles of state-driven dispossession. \n\nMohamed Salah Abdelrahman then discussed  the paradoxical relationship between Sudan’s gold boom and the state’s deepening developmental failures and fragility. Despite gold’s rise to over 58% of total exports by 2025\, this expansion has neither strengthened fiscal capacity nor improved development outcomes. Instead\, it has fueled a parallel economy\, with official channels capturing less than 21% of actual production due to widespread smuggling. This paper highlights how such a dynamic cannot be explained by resource curse theory alone\, but must account for Sudan’s weak institutional foundations and unstable governance. The study looks at how gold’s physical characteristics\, geographic dispersion\, high portability\, and artisanal extraction make it structurally resistant to state oversight; how competition over gold revenues has militarized local politics and empowered armed actors\, including the RSF; and how traditional native administration structures have been reshaped by mining’s economic logic\, collectively transforming gold into a primary driver of war economy and state collapse. \n\nGussai H. Sheikheldin and Yousif Elsamani then examined the collapse of Sudan’s science system and its consequences for economic development\, arguing that chronic underfunding\, political instability\, and foreign dependency have produced a critical “sovereignty gap” in knowledge production. Drawing on philosophy of science\, endogenous growth theory\, and a bibliometric audit of Sudan’s research landscape from 2000 to 2025\, they emphasized that autonomous domestic scientific output fell below 8% of total production by 2024\, with Sudan’s narrative increasingly shaped by external actors. The paper focuses on two structural challenges: a “broken triple helix” in which domestic industry and government have been replaced by foreign surrogates\, leaving universities as the sole fragile pillar; and a devastating brain drain\, with approximately 90% of medical graduates having left the country since 2002. It also aims to work out a post-war policy roadmap focused on decentralizing science infrastructure\, establishing agenda sovereignty\, leveraging diaspora networks\, and building institutionally independent research systems to achieve genuine epistemic and developmental resilience. \n\nIn the next session\, Mayada Hassanain explained Sudan’s persistent developmental crisis over the longue durée\, challenging essentialist explanations centered on state failure\, elite capture\, and ethnic conflict as insufficient for understanding the country’s structural economic stagnation. Drawing on theories of primitive accumulation\, sub-imperialism\, and Samir Amin’s concept of unequal exchange\, Hassanain argued that Sudan’s underdevelopment reflects deeply intertwined domestic and global political economy dynamics rather than exceptional pathology. Her work examines three historical periods: independence to the early 1970s\, the 1980s to 2000\, and 2000 to the 2020s\, and analyzes four key commodities: cotton\, oil\, livestock\, and gold. Each commodity is examined as both a driver of foreign capital accumulation and a site of violent contestation\, tracing how social relations\, labor dynamics\, state policies\, and international economic structures have collectively foreclosed structural transformation. Even Sudan’s oil boom\, which generated 7% GDP growth\, left the underlying economic structure entirely unchanged\, exemplifying this enduring paradox. \n\nAida Abbashar reframed taxation in Sudan as a fundamental site of state formation\, constitutional authority\, and political identity rather than merely a technical revenue mechanism. Tracing fiscal extraction from the Mahdist state through the Anglo-Egyptian Condominium\, postcolonial rentierism\, the Islamist shadow state\, and the current militia economy\, she detailed that the question of “who pays” has always determined “who belongs” to the national project. Where formal constitutions have been suspended or ignored\, fiscal practices\, from religious tithes to RSF checkpoint fees\, have functioned as Sudan’s living constitution. Her paper looks at how successive regimes decoupled taxation from citizenship and accountability; how commodities like gold and gum arabic became sites of contested fiscal authority rather than national development; and how the 2023 war has reduced taxation to raw checkpoint sovereignty. \n\nNext\, Rogaia Anusharaf examined Sudan’s informal economy through a feminist political economy lens\, arguing that women’s labor has always constituted the essential but systematically invisible foundation of Sudan’s economic survival across decades of structural adjustment and political instability. She contended that the April 2023 war did not create the informal economy but rather exposed its true structural centrality by dramatically expanding its boundaries. Professionals from the formal sector\, physicians\, teachers\, and engineers\, were abruptly absorbed into informal survival strategies previously feminized\, stigmatized\, and rendered invisible. The paper examines two interconnected transformations: mapping women’s pre-war role in Sudan’s informal economy across urban and rural contexts and tracing how the war reconfigured these patterns across displacement camps\, refugee settlements\, and diaspora communities. It looks at how gendered invisibility imposed on informal labor was never a reflection of its marginality\, but rather of the formal economy’s deliberate choice not to account for the work upon which everything else depended. \n\nAlzaki Alhelo traced Sudan’s political economy across three decades\, from the oil boom of 1999 through the gold era to the ongoing conflict\, arguing that a tragic continuity defines Sudan’s development failure: successive resource windfalls were captured by authoritarian elites to sustain patronage networks rather than drive structural transformation. The oil boom generated high GDP growth but entrenched crony capitalism\, while South Sudan’s secession in 2011\, stripped Sudan of 75% of oil revenues and exposed the complete absence of economic diversification. Gold emerged as a substitute export\, rising to 37% of total exports by 2022–23\, yet its predominantly artisanal structure made it resistant to regulation and taxation\, reproducing the same rent-capture dynamics. This paper examines structural transformation and informality across both eras\, drawing on labor market surveys from 2011 and 2022 to analyze how shifting resource dependencies reshaped employment patterns\, expanded informal economic activity\, and deepened Sudan’s persistent developmental crisis. \n\nIn the final session\, Khalid Osama Alfeel argued that Sudan’s industrial crisis cannot be explained by immediate economic shocks\, oil revenue loss\, gold smuggling\, or hyperinflation\, but reflects a foundational\, decades-long structural failure rooted in three interlocking forces: urban bias\, crony capitalism\, and securitization/militarization. Dating back to the colonial era\, these forces systematically concentrated resources\, power\, and industrial development in the capital city Khartoum while extracting wealth from peripheral regions without reinvestment. The paper\, which was proposed by Khalid and Muzan Alneel\, expands on three domains where these structural forces have crippled Sudan’s manufacturing economy: bank financing\, which favors large conglomerates and produces a “missing middle syndrome”; state policies governing production inputs\, shaped by political and military calculations rather than developmental logic; and infrastructure planning\, which reflects military priorities and entrenches centralization. Drawing on case studies\, key informant interviews\, industrial surveys\, and Central Bank reports\, the study offers a structural diagnosis of Sudan’s industrial vulnerability and proposes alternative pathways for rebuilding manufacturing as a pillar of post-war stability. \n\nCIRS will publish the submitted papers for this project as an edited volume.  \n\n\nTo view the working group agenda\, click here\n\n\n\nTo read the participants’ biographies\, click here\n\n\n\nRead more about this research initiative\n\n\nParticipants and Discussants:  \n\n\nMazin Abdallah\, Conflict Sensitivity Facility\n\n\n\nAida Abbashar\n\n\n\nMohamed Salah Abdelrahman\, PhD candidate\, Panthéon-Sorbonne University\n\n\n\nRogaia Mustafa Abusharaf\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nKhalid Osman Alfeel\n\n\n\nAlzaki Alhelo\, PhD candidate\, Tufts University\n\n\n\nHamid E. Ali\, Doha Institute for Graduate Studies\n\n\n\nMuez Ali\, Earthna: Center for a Sustainable Future\, Qatar Foundation\n\n\n\nMuzan Alneel\n\n\n\nMunzoul Assal\, Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI).\n\n\n\nZahra Babar\, CIRS\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nMisba Bhatti\, CIRS\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nMaryam Daud\, CIRS\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nNisrin Elamin\, University of Toronto\n\n\n\nYousif Elsamani\, University of Tokyo\n\n\n\nMayada Hassanain\, International Development Economics Associates (IDEAs)\n\n\n\nNoor Hussain\, CIRS\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nAhmed Kodouda\, Impact Policy Group\n\n\n\nSuzi Mirgani\, CIRS\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nCJ (Caleb) Pine\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nSabreen Taha\, CIRS\, Georgetown University Qatar\n\n\n\nGussai H. Sheikheldin\, Technology and Innovation Policy Research Organization (STIPRO)\n\n\n\nAlden Youn\, Yale University\n\n\nArticle by Misba Bhatti\, Research Analyst\, CIRS
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/political-economy-of-development-in-sudan-a-historical-view-of-economic-relations-trade-and-informality-workshop-i/
CATEGORIES:Regional Studies
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/04/Feautured-Image.jpeg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR