BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Center for International and Regional Studies - ECPv6.15.15//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Center for International and Regional Studies
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Moscow
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0400
TZNAME:MSK
DTSTART:20110326T230000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Moscow:20121114T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Moscow:20121115T180000
DTSTAMP:20260508T013938
CREATED:20141105T150625Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240314T104655Z
UID:10000891-1352916000-1353002400@cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu
SUMMARY:Causes and Consequences of Food Insecurity in the Middle East
DESCRIPTION:In collaboration with partner organizations\, Qatar’s National Food Security Program hosted the ‎‎“International Conference on Food Security in Dry Lands” in Doha on November 14th and 15th\, ‎‎2012. National\, regional\, and international institutions participated in the conference and ‎addressed challenges facing dry lands in their pursuit of food security. The conference focused ‎on the three thematic areas of: (i) food security; (ii) water demand\, resources\, and management; ‎and (iii) responsible investment. As part of the focus on food security\, the Center for ‎International and Regional Studies led a panel discussion titled “Causes and Consequences of ‎Food Insecurity in the Middle East” moderated by Zahra Babar\, Assistant Director of research at ‎CIRS and co-editor of the forthcoming CIRS book Food Security and Food Sovereignty in the ‎Middle East (Oxford University Press/Hurst\, 2014). The panel consisted of three panelists who presented three country case studies ‎that addressed economic\, social\, and political causes of food insecurity in Egypt\, Yemen\, and ‎Lebanon. ‎ \n\nRaymond Bush\, a professor of African Studies and Development Politics at the University of ‎Leeds\, presented on food security in Egypt. Although Egypt boasts vast areas of arable land\, ‎as well as a high level of agricultural skill and know-how\, it faces the problem of insufficient ‎food production. By exploring the Egyptian agricultural strategy since the onset of economic ‎liberalization in the 1980s\, Bush highlighted that Egypt’s inability to defend its food security is ‎due to the exclusion of farmers and food producers from the political debates that set agricultural ‎strategies. Reflective of the governing regime\, agricultural modernization strategies in Egypt have ‎been authoritarian in nature with limited outreach and sustainability. In the context of the Arab Spring\, the increased Egyptian enthusiasm for political pluralism and rural empowerment may ‎lead to the co-operative inclusion of farmers in the agricultural policy debate and the eventual ‎improvement of Egypt’s food security situation. ‎ \n\nThe second panelist\, Martha Mundy\, talked about the impact of food and agriculture policies on ‎property relations and the ecological base of food production in Yemen. A reader in Anthropology at the London School of Economics and a specialist in the ‎anthropology of the Arab World\, Mundy argued that these policies were largely influenced by oil ‎rent and oil-derived political rent while significantly disregarding the Yemeni biosphere. As the ‎international community plays an increasingly more active role in guiding Yemen towards a food-‎secure future\, Mundy emphasized the need to have a holistic approach that prioritizes farming ‎skills conducive to environmental conservation. The case of Yemen depicts that policies ‎surrounding food aid need to move beyond the sanctification of the “rules of the market\,” which ‎have led to environmental degradation\, farmers’ loss of capacity to produce food\, and exclusion ‎of farmers from the agro-based revenue accumulated by the oligarchical state. ‎ \n\nPresenting the case of food security in Lebanon was Jad Chaaban\, assistant professor of ‎Economics at the American University of Beirut. As a small-import dependent country\, Lebanon ‎faces high risks of price volatility that negatively affect its ability to meet its food and beverage ‎consumption needs. The accessibility and profitability of agricultural produce is further hindered ‎by the oligopolistic concentration of supply chain inputs and food trade monopolies. In order to ‎overcome these food security challenges\, Chaaban recommended the need for a national ‎integrated cross-sectoral food policy that takes into consideration the presence of long-term ‎residences such as refugees\, recognizes farmers as legal units\, enhances competition amongst ‎farmers\, and supports local food production.‎ \n\nIn addition to their respective case studies\, the panelists discussed additional causes of food ‎insecurity such as food-waste and post-harvest handing as well as irresponsible agricultural ‎investment. The panelists emphasized that agricultural investments need to be socially conscious ‎and not just based on profit. These investments have repercussions beyond the land rented and ‎crop produced. The fact that those who produce food are generally the most food insecure ‎indicates that equity driven agricultural production has dire consequences on farmer families and ‎environmental preservation.‎  \n\nArticle by Dwaa Osman\, Research Analyst at CIRS
URL:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/event/causes-and-consequences-food-insecurity-middle-east/
CATEGORIES:Dialogue Series,Environmental Studies,Panels,Regional Studies
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cirs.qatar.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2014/11/mehemeh-1.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR